<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>CloudViews.Org &#187; Microsoft</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cloudviews.org/tag/microsoft/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cloudviews.org</link>
	<description>Cloud Computing as a business innovation catalyst</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2011 12:12:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft in The Cloud</title>
		<link>http://www.cloudviews.org/2011/07/microsoft-in-the-cloud/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cloudviews.org/2011/07/microsoft-in-the-cloud/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2011 10:56:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rcosta</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CloudViews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[short-thoughts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cloud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cloudviews.org/?p=1183</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have been reading a lot about Microsoft finally hitting The Cloud with Office 365. Well, I couldn&#8217;t disagree more with that vision. I am not a Microsoft fan, but the true is that Microsoft as always been around. Maybe &#8230; <a href="http://www.cloudviews.org/2011/07/microsoft-in-the-cloud/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cloudviews.org/2011/07/microsoft-in-the-cloud/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is the Cloud as the vendors are claiming?</title>
		<link>http://www.cloudviews.org/2009/08/is-the-cloud-as-the-vendors-are-claim-it-is-elastic-reliable-dynamic-fault-tolerant-high-available/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cloudviews.org/2009/08/is-the-cloud-as-the-vendors-are-claim-it-is-elastic-reliable-dynamic-fault-tolerant-high-available/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 11:05:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>pcalcada</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IT Departments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amazon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cloudviews.org/?p=1052</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[IT news from Australia is presenting a work made by the UNSW School of Computer Science. In this study they try to verify if the Cloud is as the Vendors are claiming that it is: elastic, reliable, dynamic, fault tolerant, &#8230; <a href="http://www.cloudviews.org/2009/08/is-the-cloud-as-the-vendors-are-claim-it-is-elastic-reliable-dynamic-fault-tolerant-high-available/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cloudviews.org/2009/08/is-the-cloud-as-the-vendors-are-claim-it-is-elastic-reliable-dynamic-fault-tolerant-high-available/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Interesting stuff (articles that I&#8217;ve read)</title>
		<link>http://www.cloudviews.org/2009/03/interesting-stuff-articles-that-ive-read/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cloudviews.org/2009/03/interesting-stuff-articles-that-ive-read/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 19:05:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>hugo.mag</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CloudViews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IT Departments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cloud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EMC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IBM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JumpBox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cloudviews.org/?p=573</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I’ve read recently several articles about Cloud Computing that I would like to share in this blog: Start your company with a credit card and a cloud: An article showing what a small company (JumpBox) is doing. Basically they sell &#8230; <a href="http://www.cloudviews.org/2009/03/interesting-stuff-articles-that-ive-read/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cloudviews.org/2009/03/interesting-stuff-articles-that-ive-read/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can he live in the cloud for more than one week?</title>
		<link>http://www.cloudviews.org/2009/02/can-he-live-in-the-cloud-more-than-one-week/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cloudviews.org/2009/02/can-he-live-in-the-cloud-more-than-one-week/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 09:48:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>hugo.mag</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CloudViews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[User Experiences]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zdnet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cloudviews.org/?p=476</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Don&#8217;t know about you guys, but I&#8217;m looking forward to see what Christopher Dawson will write after he spends one week living in the cloud and if he will remain in the cloud or return to his normal e-mail client &#8230; <a href="http://www.cloudviews.org/2009/02/can-he-live-in-the-cloud-more-than-one-week/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cloudviews.org/2009/02/can-he-live-in-the-cloud-more-than-one-week/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>IBM, Amazon and Microsoft in the clouds</title>
		<link>http://www.cloudviews.org/2009/02/ibm-amazon-and-microsoft-in-the-clouds/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cloudviews.org/2009/02/ibm-amazon-and-microsoft-in-the-clouds/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 10:42:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>acc</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[IT Departments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amazon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IBM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cloudviews.org/?p=432</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Quoting a ZDNet article: «If there were any lingering doubts about whether Amazon Web Services were enterprise ready they dissolved this week once IBM became a partner. And now that Amazon and IBM have teamed up a picture of multiple &#8230; <a href="http://www.cloudviews.org/2009/02/ibm-amazon-and-microsoft-in-the-clouds/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cloudviews.org/2009/02/ibm-amazon-and-microsoft-in-the-clouds/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Interoperatibily, Interoperatibily, and Interoperatibily</title>
		<link>http://www.cloudviews.org/2009/01/interoperatibily-interoperatibily-and-interoperatibily/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cloudviews.org/2009/01/interoperatibily-interoperatibily-and-interoperatibily/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 13:39:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>pcalcada</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Interoperability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft Geneva]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cloudviews.org/?p=320</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In my post, that&#8217;s a follow up of Reuven Cohen initial thoughts about UCI,  I&#8217;m  analysing the same point of view of this new Reuven Cohen&#8217;s post. We already have a lot of technologies that could be used as a &#8230; <a href="http://www.cloudviews.org/2009/01/interoperatibily-interoperatibily-and-interoperatibily/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cloudviews.org/2009/01/interoperatibily-interoperatibily-and-interoperatibily/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Widget development for TV and for us all</title>
		<link>http://www.cloudviews.org/2009/01/widget-development-for-tv-and-for-us-all/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cloudviews.org/2009/01/widget-development-for-tv-and-for-us-all/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 21:05:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>hugo.mag</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[User Interfaces]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OpenSocial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Samsung]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Widget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cloudviews.org/?p=250</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The recent agreement between Yahoo and Samsung is very interesting for us tech guys. Will we be able to create new applications (and make money) for TV?  Will this extend the reach of YouTube and create more market for others &#8230; <a href="http://www.cloudviews.org/2009/01/widget-development-for-tv-and-for-us-all/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cloudviews.org/2009/01/widget-development-for-tv-and-for-us-all/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

